Archives

All posts for the month January, 2012

Debunking Christianity: William Lane Craig: \”No Amount of Evidence or Reasoning Could Convince Me I\’m Wrong\”

Published 31 January 2012 by lordgriggs

Debunking Christianity: William Lane Craig: \”No Amount of Evidence or Reasoning Could Convince Me I\’m Wrong\”

viaDebunking Christianity: William Lane Craig: \”No Amount of Evidence or Reasoning Could Convince Me I\’m Wrong\”.

Advertisements

apologeticsuk.blogspot.com/2012/01/trinity-defended.html?showComment=1327873225642#c4960806209204729634 – Translator

Published 29 January 2012 by lordgriggs

apologeticsuk.blogspot.com/2012/01/trinity-defended.html?showComment=1327873225642#c4960806209204729634 – Translator

viaapologeticsuk.blogspot.com/2012/01/trinity-defended.html?showComment=1327873225642#c4960806209204729634 – Translator.

 

Cela est bizarre!Aquin dit que l’on peut croire dans la Trinite que par la foi, que j’appell le nous le disons de la credulite. Selon la mythologie previeuse des Hebreux, Yahweh n’etait’ que le chef des dieux et avait Asherah comme femme.

Veuillez ajouter un commentaire sur tout ceci.

Published 27 January 2012 by lordgriggs

Why Evolution Is True

It never ends, does it? Even in the face of palpable unconstitutionality, state legislatures keep trying to sneak creationism into American public schools.  Of course it’s illegal, but so long as religion holds sway in the U.S. we’re going to have initiatives like this.

As the National Center for Science Education reports, such a bill has just passed an Indiana state senate committee:

Indiana’s Senate Bill 89, which if enacted would allow local school districts to “require the teaching of various theories concerning the origin of life, including creation science,” was passed by the Senate Committee on Education and Career Development on January 25, 2012. . .

. . . Testimony against the bill stressed the unconstitutionality of teaching creation science, established by the Supreme Court in 1987. Among those testifying against the bill were John Staver, professor of chemistry and science education at Purdue University; Chuck Little, executive director…

View original post 341 more words

Published 26 January 2012 by lordgriggs

Theo-sophical Ruminations

For many famous historical figures, a distinction often needs to be made between the man and the myth that surrounds him.  This is no less true for Charles Darwin.  While the mythical features of a man are often later creations by others, in the case of Darwin, he created some of his own myths through his autobiography.  In his book The Darwin Myth: The Life and Lies of Charles Darwin, Benjamin Wiker takes a critical look at the historical Darwin: the man, the myth, and his contribution to evolutionary theory.

Wiker documents several myths have arisen regarding Charles Darwin and the theory of evolution:

  1. That Darwin thought up the theory of evolution.  The notion that animals in the present evolved from earlier forms was not a novel idea.  The idea can be traced back to the ancient Greek philosopher Lucretius in the 1st century BC, and it…

View original post 1,163 more words