Richard Swinburne seriously maintains that the Holocaust,despite its evils, opens people’s hearts to God and He has produced goods out of those evils. Such can close people’s minds to Him! We naturalists find that so much unrequited evil counts against Him as omni-God or limited God whilst believers rush to that mere term, which never comes to anyones aid!
God could have produced good from good instead. Why with the establishment of Israel, a good that He could have done in good ways, has led to more strife betwixt Jewry and Arabs. That is just another argument from ignorance!
Peter Atkins appropriately told him where to go!
Swinburne does not fathom the Ockham; he feels that as God is simple- is He?- then He’s simpler than mere naturalism but no, God has His convoluted, ad hoc assumptions that make Him too far removed to be simple!
Might you give examples of theological nonsense?